Measures for the Shapes of Impact Craters

How to Quantify the Shape of an Area

In a previous post, I mentioned that Fred Calef and colleagues (2009) identified several quantitative measures helpful in distinguishing secondary impact craters from primaries on the surface of Mars. Two of the useful measures that should also be useful for evaluating craters on Ceres are the Form Ratio and the Circularity Ratio.

Described by Keith Selkirk (1982) as measures for quantitatively representing the shape of geographic areas on Earth, such as drainage basins, they are also useful for determining the "compactness" of geomorphological features elsewhere in the Solar System.

Circularity Ratio

Circularity is a ratio of a region's area to its perimeter.  Selkirk observes that a longer perimeter relative to a shape's area results in a more convoluted shape. A shorter perimeter relative to the area is more compact, with the ideal compactness occurring with a circle.

Here is the basic formula:

      circularity_ratio = area / perimeter²

For a circle, this results in a value of approximately 0.08.  To get the maximum possible value to be equal to 1, Selkirk multiples the whole thing by 4π, resulting in the final form:

      circularity_ratio = 4π * area / perimeter²

Form Ratio

The form ratio is another measure of compactness, but uses the distance between a shape's two most distant points in comparison to its area. If you consider two rectangles with the same area: a square (10 x 10), and a rectangle whose length is four times its width (5 x 20). The length between the two most distant point in the square is 14.14, while the measure between two two most distant points in the long rectangle is approximately 20.6. Same area, but quite different distal lengths. And again, a higher ratio indicates higher compactness.

Here is the formula:

      form_ratio = (4 * area) / (π * distal_length²)

By placing π as a factor in the denominator, the equation yields a ratio value between zero and one, with one being the form ratio for a circle.

These formulas can be calculated for impact craters shown in planetary images or maps using the Custom Shape Layer in JMARS, and in a future blog post I will describe how to do it.


References:

  • Selkirk, K. E. (1982). Pattern and place: an introduction to the mathematics of geography. Cambridge University Press.
  • Calef, F. J., Herrick, R. R., & Sharpton, V. L. (2009). Geomorphic analysis of small rayed craters on Mars: Examining primary versus secondary impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 114(E10). html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More About Secondary Craters

Image
Figure 1: Copernicus Crater (LROC Image/ASU/NASA) Large impact craters are surrounded by secondary craters, appearing alone, in clusters, in lines, or even in loops. These craters extend to many crater radii from the primary (see Figure 1).  I'm concerned about secondary craters since multiple ejecta projectiles from a large impact could easily strike the surface in proximity to each other simultaneously... looking very much like a doublet crater. Jay Melosh (1989) points out that as the range from the primary crater increases, secondary craters are more dispersed and their shapes are more circular.  The improved circularity of distal secondaries results from the projectile's higher velocity, and the highest velocity ejecta is typically going to travel the furthest. The lower density of secondary craters combined with them being more circular, means they look a lot like primary impact craters! Figure 2:  Secondary craters High-energy ejecta have a decent chan...
Read more

Discerning Secondary Impacts from Primary Ones

Image
Figure 1: He wrote the book A Fortunate Encounter During the poster session at #LPSC2017, I was surprised and delighted that Jay Melosh stopped to discuss my poster on doublet craters .  Not only had I cited some of his papers in my work, but he also "wrote the book" on Impact Cratering (no, really !). Dr. Melosh was genuinely interested, and also pleased to see that my co-author (and graduate advisor) was Ron Fevig , a former student of his at the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at U of A. After examining the images of potential doublets from my survey area, Figure 2: Doublet crater on Ceres he noted that the ones I had identified as "highly eroded" (see figure 2) may not be that eroded, but were possibly secondary craters, since their rims were irregular rather than cleanly circular.  He also referred me to his book for a good description. Refining Crater Identification Criteria Moving into the next phase of my research, I need to be capable of ...
Read more